RMD quality: recommend refiling when issues found
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b569b52fe
commit
1d564b2fdb
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ router.get("/api/v1/fcc/lookup", async (req, res) => {
|
||||||
id: "rmd_quality",
|
id: "rmd_quality",
|
||||||
label: "RMD Filing Quality (2026)",
|
label: "RMD Filing Quality (2026)",
|
||||||
status: worstSev === "critical" ? "red" : "yellow",
|
status: worstSev === "critical" ? "red" : "yellow",
|
||||||
detail: `${rmdIssues.length} issue(s) found: ${labels.join("; ")}${labels.length < rmdIssues.length ? ` (+${rmdIssues.length - labels.length} more)` : ""}. Your filing does not meet all 2026 FCC requirements.`,
|
detail: `${rmdIssues.length} issue(s) found: ${labels.join("; ")}${labels.length < rmdIssues.length ? ` (+${rmdIssues.length - labels.length} more)` : ""}. Your filing does not meet all 2026 FCC requirements. We recommend refiling your RMD certification with the missing sections included.`,
|
||||||
action_url: null,
|
action_url: null,
|
||||||
due_date: null,
|
due_date: null,
|
||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue